How to Improve Your Editing Skills: Part 1

Whether it’s one of your serious New Year’s resolutions or simply a method to keep boredom at bay, sharpening your editing skills is always a good idea. Always. Even thoroughly trained and experienced editors can be lulled into seeing only a limited field of errors and applying a limited set of fixes. Over the next few weeks, we’ll look at some ways you can hone your red-pen craft.
The first, and my favorite:
The Pros to Your Cons
Professionals and Your Continuing Education
Get your eyes on an experienced, professional editor’s tracked changes. I believe in the effectiveness of this method like MacGyver believes in the usefulness of duct tape. As a production editor earlier in my career, I managed and processed the work of many freelance editors. By paying attention to their editing, I enhanced my own. By the time I was hired as a full-time copyeditor at a university press, I was already a solid academic editor. But then... oh boy... then I discovered the editing archives at the press. I learned more by reading over one redlined edit by a masterful copyeditor colleague* than I did by all the studying and training of earlier years. The edits were beautiful -- needful and simple and elegant. I was surprised again and again. My best advice for copyeditors seeking training or further development of their skills: get a peep at a master editor’s tracked changes.
Get your writing (and editing) reviewed by a professional editor. Editors aren’t always great writers, so this may take some humility. It’s beneficial for at least two reasons, however. It gives you greater empathy for the authors who produce the writing you edit, and that empathy will make you a better editor. And it also reveals the sort of construction, style, and usage you find most natural and might be inclined to overlook even when it’s out of place in something you’re editing. (I feel certain that a good editor would have something to say about that previous sentence, for example.) If a clunky phrase doesn’t seem clunky to you, if a particular cliché happens to be one of the few you still kind of like, if 20 em dashes in a 200 word articles seems about right -- you might be missing a few things in the materials you’re editing. Of course, you can also have a skilled editor in your field review something you’ve edited, which has its own obvious benefits and applications. Either way, brave the critique, editors. You’ll be better for it!
Tune in over the next few weeks for more ways to improve your editing skills.
My public thanks and an enthusiastic shout-out to the incomparable copyeditors whose work I foraged in and greatly benefited from: Mary Giles and Carol Betts.
Photo Credit: Nic's events via Compfight cc





Comments
Nice Article
Anonymous
Enjoyed your comments! I look forward to Part Two.
Posted on Mon, 01/28/2013 - 9:29pm
If we don't have the pleasure
Anonymous
If we don't have the pleasure and luxury of access to an editing archive, how would you recommend getting our hands on some professional edits?
Posted on Mon, 01/28/2013 - 10:29pm
Finding pro editing to peep at
Dawn McIlvain Stahl
I'd recommend building relationships with editors online and offline as the best resource. A PDF or Word doc of a single chapter of tracked changes is easily transmitted and easily reviewed. One thing for you to consider (actually for the editor doing and sending the work to consider) -- if there are any nondisclosure clauses or similar agreements governing the work being done, it can't be shared or displayed. Most well-experienced editors, however, will have some older work in their own "editing archives" that they can share with you. If not, consider paying for an hour or two of their time and sending them some of your own writing to edit.
In addition to fellow editors, managing editors or those who hire freelancers may have sample edits that they will send you. When I requested a sample to help clarify the level of edit expected on a particular project, my contact at the publisher sent me an entire edited manuscript from the same series. It was overkill for what I needed, but was interesting to flip through.
Perhaps other readers have some ideas too?
Posted on Mon, 01/28/2013 - 11:23pm
Shane Arthur's Editing Hacks
Dawn McIlvain Stahl
Katherine O'Moore-Klopf (a paragon of an excellent and generous editor, whose Copyeditors' Knowledge Base should be in every CE's bookmarks: http://www.kokedit.com/ckb.php) reminded me of Shane Arthur's Editing Hacks site (http://editinghacks.wordpress.com/). Arthur says the site was hacked and recently moved to its new location, where things are still a bit clunky, but I just scrolled through and saw some great editing examples there.
Posted on Thu, 01/31/2013 - 11:18am
Remove the signs of plagiarism
Anonymous
The time has come when we should take an initiative to take a strict action against plagiarizers. It can be done easily by seeking the help of plagiarism checker for teachers.
Posted on Sat, 03/30/2013 - 5:18am