In the News: Handling the Work of Others

Both the book world and the journalism world have recently seen high-profile cases of writers accused of mishandling the work of other writers.
Plagiarism
Mulholland Books, an imprint of Little, Brown and Company, pulled Assassin of Secrets by Q. R. Markham from shelves and offered full refunds to those who had already purchased it. The spy novel contains numerous passages lifted from previously published works. As detailed by Edward Champion on Reluctant Habits, for example, on pages 13-35 alone Markham used plagiarized material in more than thirty passages, including the work of five different authors.
Incomplete Attribution
After questions concerning his handling of other journalists' work, Jim Romenesko, who has blogged at Poynter.org for over twelve years, resigned his position this week. Although his media aggregation blog provided links to original sources, it did not consistently use quotation marks to clearly indicate which writing was not by Romenesko. Poynter Online Director Julie Moos described Romenesko’s methods as “overaggregation” that showed a “pattern of incomplete attribution.” Steve Buttry, director of community engagement and social media for the Journal Register Co., considers the issue a punctuation error at worst. Examining the various perspectives involved, Erik Wemple, opinion blogger for the Washington Post, concludes with an intriguing takeaway, leaving us to consider what role editing could have played if this story had developed differently.
Image courtesy of Quinn Dombrowski (quinn.anya).





Comments
Plagiarism as Punctuation Errors
Anonymous
If cut-and-paste plagiarism without attribution can be dismissed as "a punctuation error at worst," as Steve Buttry argues, then many cases of libel can be excused as errors in usage and grammar. "I'm sorry, your honor. I used the wrong word and left out a comma. My editor should have caught that one." Plagiarists give writers and editors, online and off, a bad name. Honest and conscientious professionals don't steal and then defend the theft by minimizing it or blaming it on inadequate copy editing.
--Larry Constantine (Lior Samson)
Posted on Sun, 11/13/2011 - 1:54pm
Thanks for commenting
Dawn McIlvain Stahl
Certainly, reducing libel or plagiarism to the same category as mechanical errors is unjust. But elevating anything less than libel or plagiarism to the same category as those crimes is also unjust. Discussion concerning both the intent and method of attribution seems particularly relevant in an age of cut-and-paste, aggregation, and linking.
In the Romenesko situation in particular, method and intent seem to play a large role. Buttry does a far better job explaining his views than any summary here could. See, in particular, the updated content and comments to his original post: http://bit.ly/snHuaK. Note also that Moos explains on MediaBistro's 10,000 Words blog why she does not consider Romenesko's methods to have been plagiarism: http://bit.ly/vOoacV.
Posted on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 4:22pm
Detecting plagiarism
Anonymous
Using plagiarism checker free software will be a trickier method to check whether someone has provided you a freshly written write up or has just copied it from somewhere. Thus, it protects you from being cheated.
Posted on Wed, 01/16/2013 - 9:47pm