What’s in a Name? Finding Your Electronic Files Quickly
In the December 2012–January 2013 issue of Copyediting, I discuss a system for managing your electronic files from Paul Lagasse. One key to finding your files when you need them is to have a good naming system for files and folders.
Organize your e-folders
Lagasse urges people to organize their folders by task. Main folders for each client or project should contain an administrative folder, a projects folder, and a clips folder.
For example, a project folder could contain a Drafts folder and a Noncurrent Drafts folder. Each time you create a new version of a file, the old version gets moved to the Noncurrent Drafts folder. That way you always have the previous version, but it’s not cluttering up your active Drafts folder. Once the project is finished, you can delete everything in the Noncurrent Drafts folder. Lagasse recommends waiting six months and then deleting, but use your judgment on what works best for your projects. Some of them return from the grave long after they should have turned to dust.
I consider each issue of Copyediting a project. The main project folder’s name is the issue date. Our current issue’s main folder is called 2012 Dec–2013 Jan.
Inside the main folder are a series of folders named by production stage:
- 01 Original Copy
- 02 Line Edits
- 03 Copyedits
- 04 Final Copy
- 05 Layout
- 06 Proofread
- 07 Layout Corrections
- 08 Final Newsletter
Having the number of the production stage at the beginning of the folder name allows me to order the folders by stage.
Organize your e-files
Within the folders, individual file names should also be consistent and sequential. This makes searching much easier. Dates and stages are important parts of file names, as are the version number and the initials of the person making changes to the file.
For the Copyediting newsletter, each file contains the issue date, the department, and the stage: CE1212 In Depth original, CE1212 In Depth copyedit. During the editing phases, the editor’s initials (or AU for “author”) are added to the end of the file: CE1212 In Depth copyedit NP.
Once the newsletter has been laid out, the editors and I review it in Acrobat. I collect all the corrections and put them in a PDF for the designer. Files then pass back and forth between the designer and me. The designer’s file is the “original” and is named CE1212 Layout v1 JW. When I make changes, I swap out his initials for mine: CE1212 Layout v1 EB. Another version of the file is created when the designer incorporates all the changes: CE1212 Layout v2 JW. And on we go until we’re both satisfied.
The final file is the one you receive in your inbox. In-house we simply call it CE1212.
Humans love to save things. Copyeditors in general are packrats, and memory is cheap. A good file-naming system ensures that you find what you need when you need it.
How do you organize your files? Share your favorite tips in the comments section below.





Comments
variants
Anonymous
Basically, I use the same system. Though when things get out of hand (too many folders), I sometimes have a "live manuscript" folder. I also colour code the files (since Mac's can). Sent files are green. Work in progress is orange. Style guides and other references are blue.
The thing I do try to avoid is having so many folders that only one file belongs in each folder. What's the point? It is actually _less_ efficient to have to search through all the folders than it is to have all files in one list.
Some of my colleagues insist on placing the date or their initials at the beginning of the file name. Thoughts?
Posted on Tue, 11/27/2012 - 11:08am
It would depend on how you
Erin Brenner
It would depend on how you like to order your files.
Putting initials first means you can organize the files according to person. If that's useful to you, then putting initials first makes sense.
I don't see the point of putting a date in the file name until you're ready to archive that file. There's a time stamp on each file that you can order your files by. But if having the current date upfront of a file name means finding the right file quicker, then go for it.
Just having the right data in the file name, no matter the order, is a good step, because then you can use a search function to find the file. In the case of Google Desktop, it can be faster to search than to drill down into folders.
It all boils down to figuring out the best way to order and name the files so that the most people who need the files can find them quickly.
Posted on Wed, 11/28/2012 - 4:47am
File names are indeed important
sam@dragonflyed...
Erin, thanks for sharing this info. Developing a file-naming strategy seems picayune, but it's actually hugely important. Especially when you're dealing with multiple files in multiple stages of readiness.
I don't organize files date first, but I do organize project folders date first:
11_04 Green Perspectives book
11_10 Labels and Tables project
11_22 Dog catalog
12_01 Fifteen Horses manuscript
This works for me visually because my most recent projects are invariably at the bottom of the list. So I can look there first for what is likely that day's work, rather than having to scan through a long alphabetical listing.
The overall challenge, I think, is not just creating a file-naming system that works, but then imposing it across a large staff and body of clients. Not sure I have the courage for that. Gulp ....
Posted on Fri, 11/30/2012 - 12:10pm
Organizing Files
Anonymous
Have courage, Sam! If you name and archive files in a way that makes sense and is actually helpful to the coworkers, and use the system consistently, it will attract its own believers. Your disciples will spread the good word for you(;
I like putting the date at the end of the filename in the form 2013mar26. (I've tried all-numerics [20130326] for the date before, but it makes me think too hard.) In my files, the docs line up by title and then by date, and I can select the file easily.
The term "noncurrent" made me smile. My noncurrent file is nonapologetically labeled "OLD."
The numbering at the front of the filename works if those docs have to be in the same folder, but I would probably make a new folder for each.
Now I'm off to discover the wonders of the Google desktop. Thanks for a good read this morning!
Posted on Tue, 03/26/2013 - 6:37am